Search for: "MICHELLE SANDOZ" Results 1 - 20 of 22
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Nov 2015, 9:59 am
– Potenziale und Grenzen des ›Nudging‹ René Rhinow, Vielfalt und Wandel von Minderheiten – eineHerausforderung auch für die Schweiz Nigel Rodley, The Limits of Monism, the Promise of Universality: the Hissène Habré Case Yves Sandoz, Politics and Humanitarian Law: the Worm in the Fruit? [read post]
23 Apr 2017, 8:14 am
Nasrin Mosaffa, Protecting Children in and at War: From Legally Protected Subjects to ‘Others’ in the ConflictAmir Hossein Ranjbarian, A propos de quelques éclaircissements jurisprudentiels dans le ciel gris de la lutte contre la tortureLinos-Alexandre Sicilianos, Les relations entre droits de l’homme et droit international humanitaire dans la jurisprudence de la Cour européenne des droits de l’hommeJoe Verhoeven, Brèves remarques sur la répression… [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 1:17 am
This time we hear from IP lawyer Agathe Michel-de Cazotte, who writes on her experience supporting the IP Management module at Cass Business School (City, University of London).Communication to the publicKatfriend Fredy Sánchez Merino reports on an interesting case from Colombia, which considered the question of whether use of audiovisual works in public transport would be considered an act of communication to the public, such that a collecting society could demand payment of… [read post]
25 May 2009, 5:20 pm
(The IP Factor) Israel Patent Office practice regarding legal expenses in oppositions (The IP Factor)   New Zealand New Zealand launches second ACTA consultation (Michael Geist)   United Kingdom EWHC request for summary judgment denied - OHIM-IPO class heading conflict case: Daimler v Sany (IPKat)   United States US General Trade secret litigation on the rise against laid off employees (Silicon Valley IP Licensing Law Blog) Seeking and justifying attorney fee awards may be… [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm by Schachtman
ITERATIVE DISJUNCTIVE SYLLOGISM Basic propositional logic teaches that the disjunctive syllogism (modus tollendo ponens) is a valid argument, in which one of its premises is a disjunction (P v Q), and the other premise is the negation of one of the disjuncts: P v Q ~P­­­_____ ∴ Q See Irving Copi & Carl Cohen Introduction to Logic at 362 (2005). [read post]